Danger Ahead? Water Slide Soldiers On, Court Rules
- ❌😈
Slides for swimming, in any unapproved situations, need to be securely designed and maintained. - Unauthorized use of water slides is now mandated to meet safety standards by the Court.
In a surprising twist, a 37-year-old fellow squared off against the manufacturer of a notorious water slide, the lifeguards manning the pool, and the inspectors overseeing the death trap, demanding a whopping 335,000 euros in damages and emotional distress. Bet you didn't see that coming, huh? Well, he took a header down the slide, headfirst and prone, slid into the pool like a limp noodle, and smashed into the pool's edge - talk about a party pooper! The unlucky chap ended up with a spinal injury for his trouble. The Oldenburg Regional Court, however, wasn't impressed, citing warning signs forbidding such wild and reckless behavior.
The Regional Court threw the case out, declaring that a water slide isn't responsible for ensuring safety even in the event of blatant misuse. Our fearless fighter, undeterred, decided to take things up a notch and appeal the decision. The Higher Regional Court (OLG) must've been feeling generous that day; they ruled in the man's favor, awarding him damages against the swimming pool mafia and the slide's manufacturer. But don't think he gets off scot-free: the OLG saddled him with half the blame for ignoring those pesky warning signs.
In the OLG's eyes, the slide should've been designed with predictable misuse in mind - because, let's face it, we all reenact that "The Flying Tomato" stunt at some point, right? The plaintiff, being the pool's guest, had a right to expect some protection from a face-first collision with the opposite pool wall. The OLG thought that, during the planning phases, a bit more breathing room between the pool edge and the slide's terminus would've been a smart move.
The verdict was announced on March 26. The defendants had the audacity to file an appeal with the Federal Court of Justice. What a bunch of party poopers!
- Water Slide
- Oldenburg
- OLG
Interesting Facts:
- In situations like these, facilities must ensure that proper authorization is obtained for slide use to minimize the risk of accidents.
- Routinely inspecting the slides for dangerous conditions, maintaining safe operation, and ensuring that necessary safety equipment is available are other crucial aspects of slide safety.
- On-site supervision by lifeguards or attendants is crucial for enforcing safety guidelines and intervening in case of potential risks.
- The presence of safety equipment like life jackets and rescue tubes is often mandatory to decrease injury risks.
- Clear signage and warning systems inform users of potential hazards and instruct them on safe use practices.
When it comes to unauthorized water slide use in Germany, the Oldenburg Regional Court and the Higher Regional Court could consider factors such as liability, compliance with safety standards, and reasonable user expectations, evaluating the case using German civil and criminal law, the German Civil Code (BGB) and German Criminal Code (StGB), alongside relevant safety regulations and standards. For more specific court rulings or decisions, consult legal documents or legal experts knowledgeable about German jurisprudence.
- The Higher Regional Court (OLG) in the case of the water slide incident in Oldenburg, Germany, considered the design of the slide and the available safety measures, ruling that it should have been constructed with predictable misuse in mind.
- In line with the German Civil Code (BGB) and German Criminal Code (StGB), the OLG decided that the plaintiff had a right to expect some protection from a face-first collision with the pool edge, particularly in the context of health-and-wellness facilities and the science of risk management.
